“Rounds being like a dipstick” part two of a book discussion – Ch 3-5

Well this is the second instalment of our discussion as some points to comment on. The first being I just love the image of “rounds being like a dipstick” (p.110)

oil

 

Comment: there are just so many ways you might spin this image – when is something over filled – that the level changes when things are measured when cold or hot – it just goes on.

  • the difference between “Rounds” and supervisory evaluations is a bigger issue in school-based rounds settings as opposed to cross school ones (p.61)

Comment: I found this out in my original research on classroom observations – just what hat do you wear as a principal when you walk into classrooms to observe – is it feasible to differentiate between roles if you see something that not right? I think this tests our honesty – I think its beholden upon us to later on go back and say what I saw that made me feel uncomfortable – want to then make further observations (in a supervisory way) that this (whatever it is) isn’t a regular occurrence and take corrective action if it is.

  • “external rounds” is a way to practice “internal rounds” (p.68)

Comment: its like building capacity and I wonder if other network principals would be willing to have a go _ I’ll ask and answer this one later.

  • I am more likely to make a change (adjustment I would argue) if I had a chance to influence what you’re focusing on (p.74)

Comment: so true – it’s another reason for teachers to engage in discussion around a pop (problem of practice) as it creates ownership of the data.

  • “but we need someone from the outside come in to offer some calibration and help us push our practice” and I think they are talking about once a year (p.82).

Comment: if this work is not supported by others it make this external calibration and for that matter practice hard to do.

Comment: We discussed this 4th Chapter a little more and posed a question – do we have enough stoicism to keep revisiting the same problem of practice before we moved on?

  • by having (secondary) students involved in “rounds” it helped them think differently about their responsibility as students – taking responsibility for being engaged (p.91).

Comment: Interesting concept.

  • (external) rounds took 6 years before it got to school based (p.93) – that it takes time to move from the land of “nice” (p.106) and that rounds exist for differing purposes

Comment: hello this does take time BUT do we have that long? How long does it take to change a culture to a shared professional responsibility to improve our practice – if not then why are we here? AND here they were talking about rounds existing to evaluate some of our school based initiatives although I would argue that other protocols like walkthroughs could be used for some of these purposes (evaluative data collecting).

  • improvements happen quicker when you include professional learning as part of the problem solving around the pop.

Comment: professional learning I think here is defined in the broader sense.

Posted in Instructional Rounds, Leadership, school, Teaching | 3 Comments

Mark Twain’s quotes for todays age!

This quote is often attributed to Mark Twain however the site quote investigator casts some doubt on this. I found it while on twitter and another’s blog. The quote whoever penned it is still apt for today.

A person who won’t read has no advantage over one who can’t read.

One quote that Mark Twain did say is below:

quote-Mark-Twain-whenever-you-find-yourself-on-the-side-206

I find this at times reassuring as I struggle with ideas. I’m currently writing a paper about this idea knowing that a significant number oppose some of the recommendations in the paper. Yet I persist!

 

Posted in Leadership | 2 Comments

How do we scaffold what we teach in grammar to student writing?

I often hear teachers complaining or just plain confused about why students don’t transfer what they learn in one context or lesson to their performances in another. They have taught something in grammar (e.g. dependant clauses) or spelling (e.g. letter combinations that make the long a sound), students have practiced the skill and been tested on their words but see little or no transference to their own writing.

Well perhaps the question might be rephrased to – how might we scaffold the transfer specific skills taught in grammar or spelling into student writing?

Here was one such example a teacher “pulled” from the web that she used as a model in her class.

Slide1

 

What this example, which was used a model for their work around dependent and independent clauses, did was that it enabled our year 6 students to start to recognise the grammar (clauses) in their own work. This self-identification shows a such a transfer is possible.

grammar

 

Posted in Assessment, Instruction, Teaching | 2 Comments

An authentic purpose for learning – a makers market.

FullSizeRender[16]

Tonight our Year 1 and 2 students ran a “makers market” as their last performance for their technology based unit of learning “how do you make”. As you can see by the photo the market was well attended with hundreds of parents participating and buying the products students had made.

The market had a real Asian theme with the students making things like rice paper rolls, chinese lanterns and decorated bowls and cups. Asian intercultural understanding is one of the through-lines in our curriculum.

While I was announcing the winners of the raffle ( the prizes were brightly coloured heat bags made by a year 2 student and her grandmother) I was introduced by a student to her grandfather who had also attended Elsternwick PS as a student from 1942 to 1947 (the war years).

FullSizeRender[18]

He was telling me about the school during those years where there were 50 in a class with one class per level making a total of around 350 students in the whole school.

The makers market was a big deal with the teachers really extending the children’s learning with an authentic purpose and experience. A great community experience that will be remembered by our students for many years to come.

Posted in China, Instruction, Teaching | 3 Comments

DataWise – the community grows at the 2015 on-campus Institute.

The final challenge from the first day of the Data Wise Summer Institute (DWSI) here at Harvard was to encapsulate my learning experiences thus far, in only five words.

Mine was; Similar challenges towards systemic improvement.

I wanted to share my short sentence with you because it highlighted what I had heard people discuss and reflect upon all day; which is that as an international community of passionate educators, school and system leaders, our aspirations, challenges, celebrations and imperatives are the same. We all aspire each day to do the very best by every student in our class/school, so that they may each realise their full potential. We all struggle with the most precious and finite resource; that of time, (or rather the lack thereof). We wrestle with the dissonance of how we can eek every second to benefit our students and teachers, and thus build a strong community with learners of every age. We all celebrate the notable progresses in the achievement of each student, (in relation to their personal learning trajectory). We embrace and are spurred on by a common imperative; to ensure that a child’s demography does not determine their destiny.

My key takeaway was the overwhelming message from participants, that all teachers, school and system leaders want deeply to be understood by their colleagues; to have their unique contributions to the overall success of our learning organisations recognised, acknowledged and valued.

A great place to start on how you can understand people’s work preferences is to refer to the Compass Protocol at http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=datawise&pageid=icb.page556408 for more information).

Finally Data Wise have embraced social media, making it even easier to check in with what is happening this week:

Twitter: @DataWiseHarvard or https://twitter.com/DataWiseHarvard/with_replies

Facebook: DataWise Harvard

Posted in Assessment, Data Wise Program, Harvard, Teaching | 3 Comments

Diving Deep to Build Assessment Literacy – Step 2 of the Data Wise Improvement Process – Day 2

data_wise_261

The focus of Day 2 of the Summer Institute is the work around both Organising for Collaborative Work and Building Assessment Literacy, (which comprise the Prepare Phase). At Elsternwick PS with new teachers joining the team and the existing staff digging deeper we found its a stage that is never exhausted. In fact a diagram I created for the presentation Mark and I delivered at the 2012 Data Wise Impact Workshop, represents the Prepare Phase as the underground root system which provides the solid foundation and nourishment for the remainder of the Improvement cycle; the Inquire and Act Phases.

Those who are part of the Elsternwick Primary School (PS) community are likely to know that Building Assessment Literacy with teachers and school leader was the topic of my Masters thesis. It came from numerous conversations with frustrated school principals who each reported that whilst teachers were adept at collecting data, they were unable to genuinely interpret and use it to inform evidence-based, individualised student learning. Furthermore, these school principals expressed uncertainty about how to develop these skills within their own teaching staff, with some admitting that the development and implementation of a school-wide assessment schedule had not achieved this as they had thought it would have. Interestingly, this sentiment was echoed by one of the two principals leading the elementary schools I am coaching this week. And it’s not only Principals who were experiencing frustration! The overarching sentiment of the teachers involved in my Masters Action Research assignment, was that they were good at collecting data, (in fact many felt they were drowning in it), but were frustrated with their inability to ‘action it’ insofar as their lack of skills with which to genuinely interpret and use data to inform evidence-based student learning plans. (Jayne, P. 2010, unpublished thesis: Monash University, Australia)

In fact, the deliberate building of assessment literacy is one of the key characteristics that drew me to the Data Wise process in 2010-2011. This capacity building of teachers and school leaders continued today at the Institute,  and I must say that today’s session on Step 2 was vastly different to the one I participated in during June 2011, and had also been enhanced upon last years as well; which exemplifies the commitment to continual improvement and growth within the Data Wise Process, which was developed to help schools, (and more recently systems) engage in a continual improvement and inquiry process.

I also learned a lot about the rigours of standardised assessments here in the USA. It makes me grateful for my own Australian context where large-scale NAPLAN assessments are conducted within only 4 of a child’s 13 years of schooling. It makes me wonder what we might learn from one another… but that’s another post.

Finally the place of student voice within the assessment process was raised in my Green group today, again a perspective quite different from my own, and from what I know the outstanding teachers at Elsternwick PS are successfully engaging students in. However, that too is a post for another time.

If however, some of the sentiments or experiences of the educators and school leaders referred to here, resonate with you, may I suggest that you check out the new Introduction to Data Wise MOOC. This a free, self-paced online course that provides you with an overview of the Data Wise Improvement Process. If you are unsure about being what Data Wise is, or want to know more to make an evidence-based decision about integrating into your own school’s improvement strategy, then this is the place to go!

Introduction to Data Wise MOOC: https://www.edx.org/course/introduction-data-wise-collaborative-harvardx-gse3x

Posted in Assessment, Data Wise Program, Harvard, Teaching, Travel | 5 Comments

Victoria the “ice” capital of South East Asia !

FullSizeRender[17]

Today at our local State principal network we heard from Les Twentyman a long serving youth outreach worker who has supported the marginalised and at risk young people who are generally homeless and on the streets.

A few years ago he set up a charity called the 20th man, a term that was once used for the bench player in our Aussie rules football teams. The organisation does outstanding work in supporting our at risk youth in so many different ways (check out the link).

However today he was talking about the “ice epidemic” affecting our youth. My attention was caught by his statement that Victoria is the ice capital of South East Asia. Now that’s one “award” that we don’t want to win and it certainly is nothing to be proud of.

Les talked about there simply are not enough police to arrest people (or prisons to hold them) for taking and distributing “ice” if that’s our main solution to the epidemic.

Yes in our drug education curriculum (secondary schools) we do “learning” about this but he was really today talking about our linkages to youth workers as these marginalised youth are often drug affected and with that comes the irrationality, the violence and the homelessness making schools difficult places to attend or difficulty for us (teachers) in dealing with and coping ourselves with the issues.

Really an issue we need for parents in our community to understand. Part of this understanding comes from sharing information hence the clip, which we viewed a little of today, to finish my post.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Meaningful Reading Comprehension – students doing the work!

inferring

This is a year 2 boy’s attempt to infer the meaning of words in a non fiction book of his choosing. Both the teacher and I thought this a really good artefact to show his reading comprehension development.

The first column displays his attempts to pick up the vocabulary of the text ,which for the most part, are tier 3 or technical words. He has also identified if he can read the word (or not) with the comment (can’t say).

The second column shows his attempt to infer the meaning the word from the text. The guidelines for the activity don’t allow the use of a dictionary.

The third column is where he then confirms his guess usually by rereading the text. The teacher also makes a comment or provides clarification or even a challenge (notice the comment on ecology).

He also makes reference to the ZOC which is what the kids call the zone of confusion (where we really don’t know something or are puzzled as we don’t even understand the answer). It’s a really interesting space to metacognitively notice.

He was proud of his achievement and he will get one of my certificate of excellence awards at an upcoming whole school assembly. We reward both effort and achievement.

My point is showing this piece is how far have we come as teachers in extending student thought in our reading workshops. This wasn’t achieved using the former early years literacy model of rotations of different reading activities – this was a sustained effort over 45 minutes after a brief 10 minute minilesson on inferring by a, just turning 7-year-old, boy. He was challenging himself, one of his workshop goals was self management, he was metacognitive, able to articulate what strategy he was using, referencing his conclusions with page numbers and learning technical vocabulary.

Now that’s “students doing the work” as Elmore would say.

Posted in Instruction, Reading, Teaching | 1 Comment

School Based Instructional Rounds: a progressive book club discussion (Ch 1 & 2)

In an earlier post I wrote about personal teacher professional learning. One of our teachers is doing a leadership course at Bastow Institute this year and her research project is using instructional rounds at the school level with teachers.

One of the professional learning strategies we are using is a book club between 3 of us.
To date we have read chapters 1 and 2 and really enjoyed the conversation. I thought a few posts as we go ahead through the book might be useful for others who are either reading or thinking about reading the book.

schoolbasedinstruc_223In Chapter One (p.20) they talked about rounds being able to “test the causal connections between an instructional initiative and the impact it has in classrooms on learning and teaching.” 

This is something we also thought about, having focused on one round on the initiative (Words their Way) for “spelling” in 2014-2015. It took 3 days with a school based team to visit about 80% of classrooms teaching spelling to make observations. We collected data and then were able to graph some results and present this to the staff for some discussion. Through discussion a number of variations in practice emerged which we then clarified through some professional learning.

We intend to complete a second set of the round now 12 months later again on spelling to see how the approach is now being implemented, what clarifications might be needed and what potential problems of practice are emerging.

Our thinking was challenged when on p.23 they talked about developmental nature of organisational improvement and the need for protocols like the 5 whys to do a root cause analysis on problems of practice – to go deeper. It’s certainly one we will use in 2015 when we present the data again and we go into discussion mode.

Chapter Two was about a small school in a rural district which opened with a teacher comment about being “walked on” (p.31) to describe teacher anxiety around observation. It was interesting to note that they expected teachers to “steal ideas”  as they observe. I think this was more about reducing anxiety and promoting collaboration – perhaps?

Marilyn Oats the principal gave a Roland Barth type quote (Learning by Heart) where he said the principal is the lead learner) when she said “My job as principal is to ask the questions, and to keep the inquiry going. I am the chief questioner – that is how I help teachers learn.”

More on the other chapters soon.

Posted in Instructional Rounds, Leadership, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

young people’s anger – here’s one thought.

I’m fortunate as a school leader that my teachers share their ideas and thoughts with me. This is one teachers share last week that resonates so strongly with me – how does one promote young people’s conversations about dealing with emotions (in this case anger).

If your running a classroom circle this month with your students – show this clip to promote a conversation. Please share your thoughts and their comments with us.

Posted in curriculum, school, Teaching, Uncategorized, Video Clips | 1 Comment

identifying teacher itches to scratch

Schools in Victoria have many standardised data sets about student learning, student attitudes to school, parent opinion surveys and finally staff opinion surveys. This post focuses on this last data set, staff opinion.

There was industrial action for the 3 earlier years stopping this new survey from being conducted in 2014. The survey results include: teachers, education support people and principal class officers. Using our evidence based practices we shared the data with staff asking for both feedback and if possible the story behind the data.

There were two data sets that we did not sit comfortably with us both about professional learning: Coherence and Applicability.

We had been “talking” about staff development for several years using older data sets like the two below:

Slide03

and

Slide06

We spent 18 months or more developing staff understandings about observation (e.g. non judgemental feedback, staying low on the ladder of inference, agreed protocols including pre and post conversations) and developed three protocols: walkthroughs, learning walks and instructional rounds.

I admit there was a certain reluctance about just going for it (teacher observation of each other: “learning walks”) for fear of wounding (not that we believed they would be intentional).

So when we got the applicability data which showed we were well below the State mean score it was a shock for the one recommended strategy for improving applicability was teacher observation. Lesson learned we had moved too cautiously. A lesson now corrected for we have facilitated teacher observation (just going over prior pd on observation to be inclusive of new staff).

Slide35

The other data set that struck discomfort was the coherence data set. When we unpacked this with staff it wasn’t so much an alignment of professional learning with our strategic improvement work but rather opportunities for personal teacher pd on their perceived needs.

Slide38

 

So once again a lesson learnt. Allowing time for teacher individual pd is now within our overall pd plan. The question we initially posed was how does one “perceive” that need and measure its effect?

Lots of the literature on personal teacher pd suggests that they look at their student data set and decide what gaps or instructional adjustments might be needed (learned) to improve individual teacher effect – the point being pd should have some effect on student learning and or engagement.

Well from the teacher feedback that point is still misunderstood by some however being a “hopeful” leader perhaps going through the personal pd experience might by learned. Most, but not all teachers, have formed into “supportive groups”  (a term that might be called professional learning communities) and are investigating practices that “interest” them: e.g student writing, use of i-pads in the early years and differentiated instruction book club to name a few.

We are all hopeful the actions taken scratch the itch teachers identified and the data sets show an improvement in 2015.

Posted in Data Wise Program, Harvard, Observation, teacher efficacy, Teaching, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Anzac Day Service at School: Lest we forget.

anzac

Recently our year 3 and 4 students led the school in the annual Anzac Day commemoration service. The service which dates back 100 years is to acknowledge those men and women who served in our armed services in conflicts and peace keeping missions.

The students investigate what the commemorative service means by visiting our local Return Service League to hear from returned soldiers and look up the history of some of our former students who died in WW1. Every student made a commemorative day clay poppy thanks to our Art Teacher Ms Taylor, which was displayed in our school garden and then taken home to “plant” in their home.

The photo shows a parent, who is veteran from the recent peace keeping missions abroad, with students holding a poppy for every former student who died in WW1.

The service was attended by over 1000 people and was very moving particularly as the last post was played. I felt proud that our students led the service which is keeping the memories of the sacrifices of those who gave their lives so that we can enjoy our current freedoms.

Lest we forget,

Posted in Community, curriculum, school | 1 Comment

Is the metaphor a leader is like a parent valid?

I have been contemplating a leadership metaphor used by Simon Sinek on a recent Ted Talk:

“great leaders are like parents wanting to give their children (employees) opportunities to try and fail in safe ways and to discipline when necessary”.

I’m struck by the use of the term “discipline” in the metaphor when applied to leadership in a school. As a practicing principal is discipline synonymous with difficult staff conversations?

Recently in reviewing a series of whole day planning sessions with some of the key facilitators we discussed why a few teams did not seem make as much progress in using standardised data sets as other teams. We posed some questions around were the teams “on the bus” – e.g. use of evidence to inform decisions or where there other factors in play e.g. external factors or lack of teaching experience or too few opportunities for training and development. Of course it’s usually a combination of factors.

That’s not to say that people in other teams at times didn’t appeared to struggle with the use of evidence.

An example of one such struggle was where one team began discussing when to teach handwriting. Some teachers saw a natural connection between teaching handwriting when they were introducing sound symbol relationships. On the surface this sounds a logical connect however handwriting, which is basically motor patterning skills doesn’t necessarily relate to sound/ symbol concepts.

There’s a lot more to that discussion and the question I eventually posed was when are young people ready to learn handwriting and what evidence might you collect to make that determination?

In the end we agreed that modelling correct letter formation was a positive thing in a variety if contexts but to insist on children practicing these letter formations could lead to a general reluctance to learn through writing if correct letter formation became the intended or even unintended expectation.

This led the team to discuss the need to collect student samples to decide who might be ready for learning and practicing correct letter formation. From that discussion teachers then perceived that handwriting might need to be taught in groups at the stage of readiness not as a whole class lesson as was the previous practice. This discussion was essentially the start of an inquiry into a teacher problem of practice.

Is this team correction (the question I posed about the use of evidence) discipline? I’m not sure. Discipline is commonly defined as getting someone to follow the rules and there is some implication of punishment if you don’t.

Did all in the team agree (from the feedback, no) but a decision was reached and the team and children can move forward in consistent ways.

Perhaps if people don’t follow the team decision that provides for consistency then discipline is applied – usually a one on one conversation between leader and in this case teacher. But is it then about natural consequences of not following the decision (e.g. children becoming reluctant writers or being shunned by others in the team) or punishment (e.g. unsatisfactory performance review?).

I know that this discussion is a slight tangent to the leader creating a safe place for learning concept however this is the second time this whole discipline/punishment idea has been raised and applied to people in organisations who are “not on or subverting the bus”.

My wondering is how others view this whole discussion.

Posted in Assessment, school administration, Teaching | 1 Comment

Teaching Writing? (part 1)

I’m sitting on the back porch of a small lodge at the base of Mt Buller listening to the babbling sound of rushing water on the Delatite River. As I gaze up from this iPad I see many differing shades of green trees sprinkled with the odd yellow-leaved deciduous tree as it sheds it leaves. There is a small open fire about 50 metres away and the smoke gently wafts upwards in the still air.

I’m trying to describe a scene of a photo I’ve taken. You can be the judge of my description using the photo located at the bottom of the page.

The point of this post is to talk about a wondering I have about writing and in particular the writing we ask of our young people in schools. Student writing is one of the main improvement goals of our school and as such is in my thoughts over this mild Easter break.

When I hear teachers speak about student writing it’s often from the technical aspect “they need to improve their paragraphing” or “I’m tired of telling them to use capital letters in the correct places”. This may seem a criticism of teachers but it’s not intended to be one. Yes one needs technical accuracy to convey one’s messages.

Recently I participated in a teacher meeting talking about using the national test criteria for assessment (NAPLAN) to lead us forward in determining what to teach students next. This in many ways should thrill me for we have been implementing an evidenced based process for determining what students need to learn next over the past few years.

So what’s my wondering/s?

When I looked at the criteria it was very technical orientated (e.g. paragraphing, sentence structure). That’s the easy part, which I’m beginning to question.

What if writing is like painting where we use words to convey our emotions like painters use colours or images to express their thoughts.

Some may remember colour by number sheets (very technical or base level stuff) and please don’t think I’m discounting the technical skills in painting. But is that what we admire or seek to replicate in paintings?

I’m thinking not!

So what is my wondering?

Part of the answer to my first wondering from a brief review of the literature on writing was that we must help students seek a wider audience and authentic purpose for writing. Much has been written about these two points for if the audience is just teachers then perhaps it’s just the technical skills we value and that our teachers are nearly facilitating editors (correcting and providing technical feedback) – again do not take this as a criticism of teachers for editing is a skill and we need technical feedback.

So yes writing as a habit (daily) and the use of writers notebooks to collect our thoughts (pre writing phase) are necessary, so is learning the technical skills, developing a wider audience and using differing authentic purposes necessary but are they sufficient?

My wondering is about non-writing teachers teaching writing. When I say non writing teachers again this may be seen as a criticism, it’s not that teachers don’t write but generally it’s job related procedural – lesson and curriculum plans and summative – student reports. Teachers job related writing audience is small and selective.

So when do teachers write – write for wider audiences – write every day (non job related) and publish. The answer I fear is seldom ( I’m not counting some forms of social media here e.g. texting). Yet we ask them to teach young people to write (to experience the anguish about using the right word or the rereading-rewriting phase trying to get their message to say what they want).

Last year a teacher charged with researching what are some of our young people’s blockers and enhancers for writing facilitated a workshop where she got teachers to write. She gave them a writer’s notebook and set some engaging challenges. It’s where I heard teachers say “I can’t write”, “I’m not a writer” but engage in the task and laugh and smile at other teachers attempts in what she perhaps unintentionally created – a writers community. That may seem a harsh reflection but are we as teachers all to willingly want to get into the right and wrong of writing (technical) but not want to wallow in the pit of uncomfortableness trying to find our writers voice.

I know some of my posts seem procedural but occasionally I do get to share some deeper feelings and I hope this one strikes a chord with others.

So what is my wondering – can teachers who do not engage as writers on a regular basis teach writing (you see it’s not the same as reading where we engage silently with our thoughts in safer places).

Thoughts?

IMG_3125

Posted in Creativity, Instruction, Teaching, writing | 1 Comment

Do we teach handwriting skills to young writers – OK – when and why?

image-20150112-23782-6m2r76

Recently I was in team meeting where teachers were discussing when to teach 5 year olds handwriting. It got me to thinking about why of my age and the old pen licences which we scrapped at least 10 years ago.

In fact our 2015 foundation year booklist has black, blue, red and green pens and grey lead pencils. Our students write using black or blue pens or grey lead pencils, revise using a green pen and edit or proofread in red. The colors help young people delineate the various stages of the writing process.

I typed in Google “teaching handwriting” and was flooded with newspaper articles from around the world with a variety of articles and an equally wide variety of opinions.

  • Lawmakers continue to fight to keep handwriting in the classroom, despite the growing power of the keyboard (Time)
  • Students’ handwriting remains the mark of learning (Sydney Morning Herald) 
  • Keyboard classes take over from handwriting lessons in Finland’s schools (The Age)
  • Teaching cursive handwriting is an outdated waste of time (the conversation) 

Some of the articles quoted conflicting research with no reference lists provided e.g. “handwriting improves brain development”. Other articles argued that students were losing their fluency and muscular strength to write 3 hr essays.

Clearly, at the very least, handwriting is about still learning motor patterns and developing muscle memory and strength in their fingers and wrists. AND last I looked we still wrote notes and lists so yes the need for handwriting remains.

Handwriting is also in our National Curriculum: e.g. Year 3 standard reads

Write using joined letters that are clearly formed and consistent in size

Although there are different versions of the handwriting style across Australia  in Victoria and Western Australia we use the modern Victorian cursive font.

Some teachers at the meetings were expressing a desire to link learning to write a letter with learning its sound-symbol relationship. While there is some link here I think we ended up agreeing that we should at least model the correct letter formation when we are teaching sound symbol relationships but that at this stage its not about explicitly teaching handwriting and having children practice the letter writing patterns.

Why you may ask?

Firstly we don’t want young writers to focus on having to write the correct pattern when for example drafting a recount of a life experience or narrative (even if its still at the emergent stage of writing – e.g. letter like shapes or drawings with a few letters below) as this shifts the focus to one of handwriting and not searching for meaning in words.

What I have repeatedly seen when the focus shifts to “perfect motor patterns” is young writers slowing down and losing meaning or interest as the process becomes laborious. This point was stressed in many education texts including the Tasmanian Education Departments sites:

If very young children are forced to hold a writing tool with the correct grasp before they are developmentally able to do so, their interest and motivation to engage in the writing process can be impaired.

https://www.education.tas.gov.au/documentcentre/Documents/Handwriting.pdf

Secondly it’s generally accepted that when we start to teach handwriting we do so with a sequence of letters or small groups of letters that have a similar characteristics (e.g. these letter have the same anti clockwise movement:  c, d, a, s, o).

Why – so that the students can use their metacognitive processes to observe and remember motor patterns or similarities of movement in handwriting? A child’s task is to learn efficient movements not to copy model shapes.

So when do you start to teach handwriting – well my point here we need to collect evidence that the child is ready by such as observing their physical dexterity, eye hand coordination or fine motor skills even their efforts to copy on their own.

My own experience here as a prep or foundation level teacher was that I found young writers at different stages of readiness therefore most of my handwriting instruction was done in smaller groups for most of the year. It wasn’t till well into year 1 that we did some practice sessions as a whole class and that changed again when we started to teach connecting letters around year 2 and 3 as the standard suggests.

Posted in Assessment, Instruction, Teaching, Uncategorized, writing | 5 Comments