This phrase “necessary but not sufficient” has been ringing in my ears of recent weeks when thinking about those students who are achieving below minimim standards.
I first heard Paul Brock use the phase and subsequently I have used it when speaking to teachers about our NAPLAN data. I was suggesting to teachers that in looking at our students results on the tests we search for different ways to improve student learning – we need to go beyond the necessary.
At the staff meeting we mapped our literacy program at each year level and agreed that it’s necessary that we all work on similar literacy strategies. However we began to question about whether the current teaching strategies were sufficient for those students below standards. We posed questions about how we might offer targetted students more literacy sessions each week. We posed other questions on how we might differentiate better our instruction during the mini lesson at the beginning of each writers or readers workshop.
It’s a tough ask for teachers to not only explicitly teach rich content [usually planned by the year level team] in consistent ways with high levels of instructional skill – now we ask that you plan and teach responding to student’s individual needs on a daily basis. It’s a real challenge for a year level team and individual teachers to come to grips with – can we offer 4 or more guided reading sessions per week for those students who need it – instead of the 2 we currently plan for ? It’s a lot to plan – with an explicit focus.
I recall a converation between Sarah my Assistant Principal and I, where we agreed that it now takes us longer to prepare for the staff meeting that the length of the actual meeting – as we try to engage teachers in rich tasks – modelling what we expect in classrooms.
One the tasks in 2009 will be to structure a timetable that releases teachers in teams – so that we get better at this task of differentiating the curriculum for each student’s needs. Teachers need more time to plan this differentiated instruction.
One of our challenges will be to provide additional instruction for those students not reaching our literacy benchmarks.